Archived
Back-catalog of reviews written before 2008.
2001 Volvo V70
0The 2001 Volvo V70 T5 was in for a rough test the moment it arrived. Why? Were we hard, uncaring drivers? Did we force it to haul six hundred pounds of manure and a grand piano? Heaven forbid–schoolchildren?
None of the above. The V70′s test was tougher than most simply because of the 1988 Volvo 740GLE wagon it was sharing driveway space with all week–the writer’s much-loved personal car.
Like loyal Saab and Subaru owners, Volvo people tend to be proud of their cars’ merits, tolerant of their shortcomings and quirks–and very, very critical of any changes to the formula, be they for better or for worse. Contrary to the “loyal buyer” concept, it can be hard to sway owners of five-, ten-, or twenty-year-old Volvos to part with their beloved companions in favor of a new model.
With the new V70 (as with the current model, launhed in 1996) Volvo has tried to split the difference, so to speak. The redesigned car continues the company’s trend toward more flowing, less boxy designs, in order to capture new customers, but it also retains a strong sense of “Volvoness” in the form of styling cues and features. This ensures that the all-new car remains familiar territory to owners of past Volvos. The most interesting feature of the new wagon is that it’s not based on a sedan platform, as most wagons are. The 2001 V70 has been designed as a wagon from the start.
Volvo knows its reputation for styling, or a lack of it: the press release for the new V70 and V70 XC was entitled, “The Box Office Releases Two New Hits.” The V70′s link to an overwhelmingly square past is immediately recognizable from the windshield back. The edges of the box have been shaved off, but not much. In paring down the wagon’s boxy form, Volvo also added a little “shoulder” at the beltline, where the passenger compartment clearly sits inboard of the side of the car. This styling cue was a part of the long-lived 140/240-series Volvo’s look from its introduction in 1967. The shoulder cue is also used on other current Volvos, most notably the S80. It keeps the family look strong. Where the shoulders meet the hood, they taper to the familiar, square Volvo grille. The strong vee shape in the V70′s hood is a visual link to Volvos all the way back to the 1940s PV444 model.
Inside, the V70 is light and airy. Light colors have been used on the dash and interior of the car to make things a little less somber inside. In keeping with Volvo tradition, the front seats are practically lounge chairs, multi-adjustable and easily comfortable enough for a full day of driving. The rear seats are equally accommodating. The panel housing radio and air conditioning controls is completely flat, and angled slightly toward the driver. It detracts from the upscale look of the interior somewhat. And the stereo controls are extremely confusing the first time through. Read the manual, or search for stations before leaving home.
Minor complaints aside, however, the V70 is a great place to be a driver or passenger. It’s absolutely packed with family-oriented surprise-and-delight features. From back to front, you’ll find an optional rear-facing child seat with seatbelts (long a Volvo wagon staple) that folds up out of the floor. On cars not equipped with the third seat, a handy, bungee-cord-equipped grocery bag holder keeps food from tumbling about. Back-seat passengers will appreciate the center armrest which folds out into a desk, a trash basket or large water bottle holder in the rear of the front console, and air vents on the B-pillars just behind the front seats. No more waiting for the AC to reach the back of the car. For drivers with toddlers, optional booster seats flip up out of the rear seats. They raise the child to window level, keep the seatbelts snug, and shorten the front cushion for comfort. For drivers without families, Volvo has installed a coathanger hook on the side of the front passenger seat, to keep coats and dry-cleaning within easy reach. Sound system controls are located in the steering wheel. And the optional GPS system’s liquid crystal display rises out of the top of the dash with the touch of a button.
Volvo would like for its V-series cars to steal family buyers away from minivans. The long list of surprise and delight features is just one of its means to that end. Another is the driving experience. Where most minivans feel ponderous and slow, the 247 horsepower turning the wheels ensures that the the V70 retains that family-friendly substantial, bulky feeling, it certainly isn’t sluggish. The turbocharged five-cylinder lets out a contralto growl under hard acceleration, then falls nearly silent on the freeway. There is some noticeable turbo lag when accelerating from a standstill. Our test vehicle was equipped with the optional Geartronic selectable automatic transmission. As with Porsche’s Tiptronic, Chrysler’s AutoStick and others, the gearshift lever can be used as a paddle to manually shift up or down. Volvo’s system is about average–shifts are performed somewhat more slowly than they would be in a fully manual transmission, but they’re also smoother.
Station wagons are inherently more stable than minivans, but the V70 also has the feeling of solid safety that many minivans give through means of sheer mass. The V70 feels as if it were carved out of a single block of metal. With decent feedback from the optional 17″ wheels and typically tight, fast Volvo steering, it’s a good handler on curvy roads. Its mass does get the better of it on the tighter bends however, and it gets nervous as all that weight starts to shift. Not to worry. Volvo concentrated on a suspension that would remain responsive whether the car was empty or fully laden, and Volvo’s Dynamic Stability Traction Control (DSTC) anti-skid system helps to keep the car in line. A sensor allows DSTC to register that the turns of the steering wheel aren’t agreeing with the car’s course (as in a skid on slick pavement or ice), and then uses the brakes to correct. It’s also a big help in improving vehicle stability in sudden brake-and-swerve situations. DSTC was triggered twice during the V70′s stay with us, and we found it to be a very unobtrusive system; the light came on, but we felt no disconcerting interference from the car. And of course, if you must stop after all of that swerving, big four-wheel discs bring the V70 to a halt confidently and safely. ABS is standard.
Of course, it wouldn’t be a Volvo without a host of safety features. In addition to the standard dual-powered airbags up front, side airbags, and an extensive safety cage built into the structure of the car, the new V70 also pioneers Volvo’s Inflatable Side Curtain (IC). This long airbag drops out of the B-pillar to cover front and rear side windows in the event of a side impact, protecting passengers’ heads from striking the side windows. Additinally, the front seats feature Volvo’s Whiplash Protecting Seating System (WHIPS) system of active head restraints, designed to reduce the danger of whiplash in a rear-end collision.
All of these features and safety come at a price, however. And that price is $32,400, for a base V70. The higher-performance T5 includes the more powerful turbocharged engine, traction control, cassette/CD player, and a trip computer, and starts at $33,400. Our test car was equipped with the more sophisticated DSTC, a sunroof, and a full leather interior, and it stickered for close to $40,000. And, if you’re not impressed by that, the all-wheel drive, pseudo sport-ute V70 XC coming along shortly will be even pricier than that. In its favor, though, the well-equipped V70 is a true luxury car, and to get similar opulence in a minivan or sport-ute commands a similar price tag.
Oh, sure, you’ll hear the Volvo old-timers moaning about how the company has forgotten its roots, and how the last true Volvo was the 850, or the S90, or the 240, or the 1800 and so on back through the ages. They always do that when a new Volvo is introduced. In the end, though, the all-new V70 should please both new and veteran Volvo owners. It’s too good a car not to. And coming from a loyal 740 owner, that’s high praise indeed.
The Fact Box:
All specs are for the 2001 Volvo V70 T5, which we tested.
Length: 185.4 in.
Width: 71 in.
Height: 58.6 in.
Wheelbase: 108.5 in.
Curb weight: 3366 lb
Cargo space: 35.9 cu.ft. (seat up)
71.4 cu.ft. (seat folded)
Base price: $33,400
Price as tested: $38,500 (est.)
Engine: 2.3 liter turbocharged five cylinder
Drivetrain: five-speed selectable automatic, front wheel drive
Horsepower: 197 @ 6000 rpm
Torque: 210 @ 1800-5200 rpm
Fuel capacity: 21.1 gal.
Est. mileage: 21/27 mpg
6/2009 update: The V70 has matured into a decent car. Modern electronics make it a bit more complex than my old 740 was, but I’d still consider one if I was in the market for another Swedish wagon.
2001 Chevrolet Impala
0A lot of people were angry when Chevrolet pulled the plug on the Caprice and abandoned the full-size, rear-drive market to Ford. It was total chaos. Outraged police officers and senior citizens marched, demanding the right to a large car that wasn’t a Ford Crown Victoria. Rear-drive sedan buyers rioted, set fires, and looted stores. For a few days, the suburbs plunged into anarchy…
Okay, that’s not the least bit true, except for the first part; many people were disappointed when the Chevy Caprice went away, leaving the Malibu as the largest sedan available from GM’s bread-and-butter nameplate. Because, let’s face it, the current Malibu isn’t and never was all that interesting.
The Impala, resurrected this year after a four-year hiatus, does not fall into the “boring” category. It’s not quite as wildly designed as other big GM sedans (the Pontiac Bonneville pops to mind) but you won’t mistake the Impala for anything else. All-new for 2000, the Impala enters 2001 with the addition of General Motors’ OnStar system as the major change. OnStar turns up in most of GM’s line this year; it’s a communications system that can contact emergency personnel in the event of an accident or (with a subscription to the service) offer concierge-type services to owners.
The indifferent, faceless design that plagued GM products for years is on its way to being a memory. Like its partner on the showroom floor, the Monte Carlo, we found the Impala’s design a little bit unsophisticated at first, but over the course of our drive it grew on us. Next to a Bonneville it looks downright understated. Up front, quad round headlights ride in blacked-out pods that give light-colored Impalas like our silver test car a raccoon-faced look. The 16″, five-spoke aluminum wheels on our LS test model are clearly meant to evoke the 1994-96 Impala SS’ sporty, aggressive stance. That poise is enhanced by a subtle, rising line that runs the length of the car and doesn’t show up in most photos. At the rear, four large round taillights give the Impala an, ahem, unique departing signature. The LS’ spoiler shows up in the rearview mirror.
Impala passengers are treated to a spacious interior that’s somewhat more luxurious than the price would suggest. Like the Ford Crown Victoria, it’s not stuffed to bursting with gadgets, but then Chevys have never really been about that anyway. It’s a big, honest family sedan (presumably built for big, honest families). The front seats are a letdown; upper seatbacks that curve away from the body and hollow headrests left our neck and shoulders fatigued after a hundred-mile drive. On the plus side, the Impala is spacious, front and rear. The dash is a swoop of grey (or beige) plastic that’s just sculpted and wood-accented enough to avoid looking impossibly cheap. The center console on our five-passenger test vehicle was a familiar place for Chevy folk, with a T-handle shifter and deep center cubby. Like most big sedans, the Impala is somewhat high-waisted, so short drivers will find that the window sills and dash are at nose-level.
What about power? Well, you might want to sit down, and try not to think about the 260-hp V8 that powered the Impala SS of the late 1990s. This is a new car. No more V8 driving the rear wheels, remember? The new Impala is a front-wheel drive, 3.8 liter V6, and the Impala LS churns out 200 horsepower. It’s enough to get the big (3466-lb) car moving, but you won’t be terrorizing Mustangs. Seriously, though, the Impala’s not about chasing pony cars. Those looks may be slightly sporty, but they’re still gracing a car whose native territory is long stretches of good ol’ American superhighway. Try hopping into a Mustang Cobra with the wife, both kids, and a week’s worth of luggage and driving from Atlantic City to Yellowstone, and you’ll understand.
Despite the front-drive chassis, the Impala rides very much like a “traditional” American sedan; that is, it’s big and quiet on the road. It’s a quiet car, thanks to a special aluminum engine cradle and a stiff body. Again, the Impala feels like a more expensive car.
Four-wheel disc brakes and a fully independent MacPherson strut suspension are standard fare for the Impala line. Our test vehicle was equipped with the LS Sport Touring suspension, which consists primarily of thicker swaybars and variable-rate coil springs up front. Even with the uprated springs, the Impala LS has more of a wide-bodied, floaty and boaty feel than its stablemates. It comes as no surprise that the Impala’s weight makes itself evident in hard corners. The body roll is also there, just like in the big sedans of yore, but the Impala is reasonably predictable. The Car Guys will snort that an Audi A8 or Lincoln LS could do the job much more quickly and neatly. Apples and oranges. Sure, the Impala wanders a little on the freeway, if you don’t keep tabs on it. So do the Ford Crown Victoria and Taurus, though, which are this car’s real competition. On the freeway, the Impala is in its element, and the drive is indistinguishable from that of its rear-wheel-drive competition. Chevy has managed to successfully swap the drive wheels and defy tradition without spoiling the intended formula–big, family road-trip car.
Of course, there’s no shortage of large, road-trippable family sedans–but most of them cost over $35,000. Compare that to the Impala’s LS’ $22,925 bottom line, which includes the OnStar system and a long options list: side airbag for the driver, trip computer, traction control, ABS, a sunroof, and more. Our test vehicle was equipped with a leather interior and upgraded stereo, and stickered for $24,894. In the face of that kind of value, the slight tradeoff in sophistication starts to look very, very worthwhile (to all except the hard-core car people, of course).
So, it’s true, we have to come to grips with the fact that the rear-wheel-drive Chevy Impala is gone forever. But that doesn’t mean that the breed is dead. It’s just evolved a little bit.
The Fact Box:
All specs are for the 2001 Chevrolet Impala LS, which we tested.
Length: 200.0 inches
Width: 73.0 inches
Height: 57.3 inches
Wheelbase: 110.5 inches
Curb weight: 3466 lb.
Cargo space: 18.6 cu.ft.
Base price: $22,925
Price as tested: $24,894
Engine: 3.8 liter OHV V6
Drivetrain: four-speed automatic
Horsepower: 200 @ 5200
Torque: 225 @ 4000
Fuel capacity: 17.0 gallons
Est. mileage: 20/30
6/2009 look back: This generation of Impalas lasted a good long time, and Chevy certainly sold a lot of them. Decent freeway fuel economy and build quality mean that it’s an affordable, if boring, used car eight years down the road.
2000 Acura 3.2 TL
0Wow. Leather and wood, in-dash satellite navigation system, silky V6 power, CD and sunroof. Does it get any better than this?
Well, to be honest, it does. This is the 2000 Acura 3.2 TL. It’s neither the largest nor the most luxurious car on the road. It isn’t even the top-of-the-line Acura. It’s one of the better members of a group of cars known as near-luxury vehicles: cars like the Mazda Millenia, Infiniti I30, Volvo S70, and Chrysler 300M. Most of them are just good enough to make you wonder if you really need any more amenities than you’ve got, and the 3.2 TL is no exception. Perhaps the most amazing thing about the Acura 3.2TL is that it’s not the absolute be-all, end-all of near-luxury sedans. It’s not unanimously considered the most outstanding in its class. That lack of distinction speaks volumes about just how good the near-luxury class is, and belies the fact that the 3.2TL is a very, very nice car.
Acura’s lineup has gotten confusing in recent years, since it replaced the names of its cars–Legend, Vigor, etc.–for alphanumeric combinations. The only Acura that still has a real name is the Integra. The company made the change in an effort to increase customer recognition of the Acura name, rather than individual model names. Thus far, the only result has been uncertainty as to which is the TL, CL, or RL. In its second year, the 3.2 TL is the middle-tier Acura, midway between the compact Integra and larger RL. The CL is the coupe version of the TL. Confused yet? Study up before Acura’s SUV comes along in a year or two!
The confusion evaporates with one look at the 3.2 TL, as the average onlooker says to himself, “Oh, it’s a gussied-up Accord.” Unfortunately, that’s what it looks like. The 3.2 TL’s biggest flaw is a lack of distance from the Accord. Both inside and out, the cars share lines and textures–the TL uses more expensive, more upscale materials, naturally. But a pricier-looking grain on the dash and some liberally applied chrome and wood just aren’t enough to set the TL apart. Even without a decent personality, though, the TL is an impressive car. It’s a testament to how good the segment has gotten when realizing that the Acura isn’t the best of the breed, because it’s so good.
The upscale-Accord look is strongest from the front. Except for the big bright chrome Acura family grille, the lines of the front end are basically the same as the angular Honda’s. They share a similar tapering hoodline and similar triangular headlights. The sides are relatively featureless. From the rear, the TL looks better. The trunklid slopes down to handsome orange and red jeweled taillights that don’t resemble the Accord’s at all. The dual chrome exhaust tips add a sporty touch. Despite the design’s closeness to its Honda cousin’s, our dark blue test car drew a fair amount of attention from passersby. The look is upscale, just not unique.
Inside, the luxurious leather, chrome and wood theme is interpreted, if a little blandly. The TL is nicely laid out, but still distressingly similar to the Accord. The gauges, radio, and climate controls are in the same places, and the dash architecture is more or less the same. The TL doesn’t go out of its way to please the eyes or fingers. It’s not bad, just not special. The silky leather seats have strong side bolsters. Brightwork is supplied by a brushed aluminum shifter surround, and chrome door handles, which clash somewhat. An interesting fillip is the cupholder cover; a touch of a button causes dual doors to glide open like the cargo doors on the space shuttle. It’s cute.
Our test car was equipped with the optional DVD-based Acura Navigational System. The touch screen-controlled resides in the middle of the dashboard, and the display can be switched to control the air conditioning as well. The Acura’s map works well, locating the car on a scrolling map of the area. It can be zoomed in and out, from a multi-mile view down to 1/20 of a mile. The system gets its information from a DVD data disc located in the trunk. The disc contains maps for the entire United States. The system is easy to program, provided the driver isn’t trying to do it and drive. Once a destination has been selected, the system offers voice prompts when necessary. Some of the tighter streets in downtown Austin, confused the system, but it got us faithfully to our destination on each of six separate trial runs.
Like most of its peers, the 3.2TL is happiest with long-distance travel. Commuting and stop-and-go traffic make the car a bit claustrophobic. It wants more road space than a similarly sized Taurus or Camry. The 225-hp V6 puts power to the road eagerly, with the help of Honda’s Variable Valve Timing and Lift Electronic Control (VTEC) system. The semi-manual Sportshift transmission is at its best in passing situations; on a two-lane road, clicking quickly down two gears enables the Acura to minimize passing times. The car is in its element on lightly curvy back roads and blue highways, without the interruptions of traffic lights and other vehicles.
True to its near-luxury nature, the 3.2 TL sports a long list of standard equipment. Leather interior, heated seats, a moonroof, and a premium Acura/Bose cassette/CD sound system are all standard. Dual-stage driver and passenger airbags and side bags are also standard on all 3.2 TLs. Also standard are Acura’s four-year/50,000-mile warranty, and Acura Total Luxury Care (TLC). Much like an auto club, Acura TLC includes roadside assistance, concierge services, and trip routing. The 3.2 TL’s only option is the Acura Navigation System.
The Fact Box:
All specs are for the 2000 Acura 3.2 TL, which we tested.
Length: 192.9 inches
Width: 70.3 inches
Height: 56.1 inches
Wheelbase: 108.1 inches
Curb weight: 3494 lbs
Cargo space: 14.3 cu. ft.
Base price:
Price as tested:
Engine: 3.2 liter V6
Drivetrain: 5-speed automatic with manual shift select, front-wheel-drive
Horsepower: 225 hp @ 5600 rpm
Torque: 215 ft/lb @ 4700 rpm
Fuel capacity: 17.2 gallons
Est. mileage: 19/29 mpg
Update 6/2009: The ’00 TL has aged moderately well. They weren’t common when they were new, so it’s rare to see them on the used-car lots. The styling is still bland, and not in a timeless way.


